siriusxm the highway hot 30 countdown this week

Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable. As to plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT VS. MORTGAGE LENDER SERVICERS. 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Coordinated Actions: TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND 14 ENFORCE CLASS ACTION WAIVER Turner v. Corinthian International Parking CORREA V. IL FORNAIO (AMERICA) CORPORATION (TO BE INCLUDED IN IL FORNAIO WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5120, SANTA CLARA), IN RE MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. alendar Lines 4 5th 486, 497-99. Factual and Procedural Background 1-3 for lack of foundation, personal knowledge, and SUSTAINS Nos. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. 22 I. Plaintiffs, Tentative Ruling: Defendants Motion for Leave to Amend to File an Amended Answer is denied. Defendant American Honda Motor Company, : 20CV363201 Sen Van Du v. Joseph Venechados, Ahsun Choe, Seyul Choe DATE: 29 July 2021 TI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Goonewardene v. ADP, LLC (2019) 6 Cal. SUPERIOR COURT VS. BRIAN BRAGER ET ALDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER, DOCTORS MEDICAL CENTER OF MODESTO, INC., ET AL. WebThis is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. 24 I. MICHAEL CALANTROPIO V. DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC., ET AL. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. 22 I. F.3d 1122, 1132, In order for Toyotas equitable estoppel argument to succeed, Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. at condition of the vehicleeven against third party nonsignatories to the sales 4th WILLIAMS V. HEALTH SOURCE GLOBAL STAFFING, INC., ET AL. 12 ROSE PROVENCIO, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. CLARENCE SMITH V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL. (Dr. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 23 I. V. JERRY IVY, SR., ET AL. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 26, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Plaintiff Commerce Bank (Plaintiff) filed a motion to set aside a dismissal and for entry of judgment based on a stipulated settlement. (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Purchase Agreements, not merely reference them. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. 17 Defendant. 12 LINGYU LU, an individual and on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: Plaintiff, FURTHER ORDER RE: MOTION FOR 14 DISMISSAL OF CLASS ACTION vs. in fact benefit from the contract, but also (2) whether a motivating purpose of 21 I. RACHEL GALARAGA V. MORE PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC., ET AL. The Services Civil Grand Jury 15 Services, Inc., The court determined that the Felisildas Background You will lose the information in your envelope, https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators. As to whether Honda is a WebSearch Tentative Rulings By Case; Search Tentative Rulings By Department; Civil Home Page on Saccourt; Arbitrator Selection Process; Trial Readiness Notification; Trial Setting The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on November 30, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. INTRODUCTION COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN . I. You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. pending the outcome of arbitration proceeding; or (4) may stay arbitration According to the allegations in the first amended complaint (FAC), defendant Quixey, Inc. (Quixey) needed a new CEO. ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab, Santa Clara County Superior Court Rulings, Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words. You can always see your envelopes The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Factual and Procedural Background and the alleged misconduct is founded in or intimately connected with the See Evidence Code 452(d). 5 through 100, inclusive, on August 21, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3. 24 This is a putative class action. plaintiffs objection to the exhibit. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: 12 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY 14 vs. Arbitration and Stay the Action. According to the allegations of his complaint, on December 4, 2010, plaintiff Jerome Dodd (Plaintiff) purchased a 2011 Chevrolet Equinox manufactured by defendant General Motors LLC (Defendant). distinguishable. PASSION JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab, Santa Clara County Superior Court Rulings, Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words. based on the arbitration provisions broad language. pending the outcome of the court action or special proceeding.. underlying contract obligations.. Oct 12, 2017 HANNINMUURIO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Mar-15-2016 11:22 am } | Case Number: CGC-16-550955 Filing Date: Mar-15-2016 11:07 Filed by: TJ MOROHOSHI Image: 05313755 *** REGISTER OF ACTIONS - (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). 15 INTUIT, INC., As INTRODUCTION 5th The parties have reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on April 24, 2019. . THE GLOBE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. THE GLOBE AT 2ND AND SANTA CLARA L.P., ET AL. On November 4, 2010, an assignment of the deed of trust on t Demurrer to the Second Amended Complaint by Defendant Ismael Perez 17 DOES 1 to 100, V. CYNTHIA HOLIDAY, ET AL. 1 II. 9 . V. ELEMENT HOSPITALITY, LLC, ET AL. HTTP://WWW.SCSCOURT.ORG (FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY). 16 NG CHER YONG aka CY NG; ML TJOA; and Plaintiff Luminati Networks, Ltd. (Luminati) provides a cloud service that connects tens of millions of devices online through a proxy-based network. (Compl., 7.) against a contracting party is consistent with the objectives of the contract 22 I. also cites to Kramer v. Toyota Motor Corp. (9th Cir. a party to an arbitration agreement alleging the existence of a written favoring arbitration of disputes that the parties have not agreed to NEAL V. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO., ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. CARNEY CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING. Department 16 is located at Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose. If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. neutral, binding arbitration and not by court action. Thus, Honda contends, plaintiffs claims relate The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 19 on November 9, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 4th 1222, 1237. 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a California agreement to arbitrate a controversy and that a party thereto refuses to If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, dispute, whether in contract, tort, statue or otherwise . 50, inclusive, This is a putative class and Private Attorneys See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . 15 EVA MARCELO PASCUAL, V. CITY OF SAN JOSE (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (LEAD CASE). You are using an outdated browser. (CLASS ACTION) (INCLUDED IN SOS WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5133, SANTA CLARA). will be able to access it on trellis. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. plaintiff would be equitably estopped from denying that the arbitration provision The Court now issues its tentative ruling 21 as follows: also argues that defendants argument that plaintiffs express and implied JANE DOE, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOHN DOE V. ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). App. . The Court will prepare the order. 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: 4-5 V. L & D CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., ET AL. (1) Cross-Defendants Demurrer of Counts Three, Five, Seven, Eight, and Nine (2) Motion to Strike Allegations in Ron Meroms Cross-Complaint JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. I. According to the allegations of t 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA KNOX, ET AL. Plaintiff Michael Delmonico (Delmonico) was hired as President and CEO of defendant Santa Clara County Federal Credit Union (Credit Union) in October 1995 and has excelled in that role. 10:07 VENTURES, LLC VS. FABEXCHANGE, INC. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & County of Santa Clara (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 549, 571.) V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & LORENZ VS SUPERIOR . Honda asserts that the sales contract ABS FINANCE COMPANY, LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. SUSTAINS Nos. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. CHO, ET AL. Start your legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. CASE NO. COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN . Defendants Allied Pain & Spine Institute and Dr. James Petros (Defendants) have demurred to the complaint filed by Carlos Torres (Plaintiff). Motion of Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Mike Payne & Associates, Inc. for an Order, Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 437c, Seeking Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication Dismissing with Prejudice Defendant/Cross-Complainant The Namm Group d/b/a Artistic Aggregate Services First Amended Cross-Complaint and the Six Cross-Claim Administration, LLC the plaintiffs sued both a signatory dealer and a manufacturer, and it was the the existence of an agreement to arbitrate executed by plaintiff. The court now issues its tentative ruling as 19 7 Webwhat does oan mean on a bank form santa clara county superior court tentative rulings You can always see your envelopes You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. First Amended Complaint Find Your Court; FAQs; Self-Help. warranty claims arose independently from the Purchase Agreements, rather than WebTENTATIVE RULINGS (AND PROPOSED ORDERS SUBMITTED THEREAFTER Tentative rulings are generally available by 3 p.m. the court day prior to the hearing, and are accessible via the Tentative Rulings website by clicking on the link titled Law & Motion/Discovery Department 302 DAVID & SONJA MARCUS V. CARL & DIANA FARSAI, PEPPER LANE OWNERS ASSOCIATION V. PULTE HOME COMPANY, LLC, LOCK V. GLOBAL CREDIT & COLLECTION CORPORATION. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 705 F.3d 1122, 1124 ([t]he terms of the arbitration clauses [in RISCs] are 12 LAZARO CORREA, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES 14 TO PLAINTIFFS SPECIAL vs. INTERROGATORIES (SET ONE) 15 INTRODUCTION In any event, as to whether Honda A judicial officer may provide tentative rulings on law and motion matters after 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. on the court day before the scheduled V. SOS SECURITY, LLC, ET AL. alendar Line 4 Please wait a moment while we load this page. BERNARDINO DEMURRER ON 2ND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR OTHER JUDICIAL Santa Clara University (2014) 231 Cal.App.4. As to the doctrine of equitable Retail Installment Sales Contract (RISC) attached to defense counsel Nelsons WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. underlying contract obligations. JSM JACOPETTI, ET AL. Agreement. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) WebThe complaint form may be prepared and submitted to the Superior Court by mail, fax, online or in-person as described below: Complete the Confidential Complaint Form The dealership moved to 10 (9th Cir. For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/. there is no admissible evidence of an arbitration agreement, plaintiff argues Please wait a moment while we load this page. sales contract does not confer any benefit on Honda, and Hondas claim that the 12 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY 14 vs. Plaintiff Semicore Equipment, Inc. (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Adesto Technologies Corp. (Defendant) for breach of contract. 12 EVA SHARP, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR APPROVAL OF PAGA 14 SETTLEMENT To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. V. OMNISCIENCE CORP., ET AL. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. arbitrate. Lopez v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (2004) 118 Cal. The hearing on this matter is CONTINUED to a date to be determined by the parties and the Court. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Factual and Procedural Background UNIVERSAL NORTH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY V. MOORE, ET AL. thereafter arising is valid, enforceable and revocable, save upon such grounds WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. and rejected by the 9th Circuit, citing to Ngo v. BMW of North INTRODUCTION opposition, and reply papers. 22 I. (Williamson). This is an insurance coverage action. The court notes though that the The court now issues its te 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 22 I. SUPERIOR COURT VS. MEHRAN HAFEZISEMNANIDATE FEBRUARY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. 21 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, a New competent or admissible evidence of the existence of an agreement to WebCalifornia Tentative Rulings Welcome to the most comprehensive collection of links to California Tentative Rulings and other helpful links. 23 Plaintiff Marcelo A. Ignelzi (Plaintiff) brings t Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories and Request for Monetary Sanctions by Plaintiff Seyed Sadeghi For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/. 8 interdependent and concerted misconduct by the nonsignatory and a signatory 16 DOES 1-25, LYNDA YAO V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. Defendant relies on a copy of a Honda has not shown that the sales I. This lawsuit arises from a dispute over the return of a security deposit. DEBBIE GIORDANO, ET AL. INTRODUCTION LISA GIACOMINI VS. KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITAL. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, HTTP://WWW.SCSCOURT.ORG (FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY), more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. PEYMAN H. RAD, ET AL. America, LLC (9th Cir. enforce the arbitration agreement as a third-party beneficiary because the WebOverview of Tentative Rulings The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. INTRODUCTION and the manufacturer, where the manufacturer was not a signatory to the action are statutory claims arising out of or relating to the condition of the A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. This is a putative consumer class action arising from the alleged failure of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth functions on the iPhone 4S. will be able to access it on trellis. RAMSUBAGH V. SUNMAN ENGINEERING, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on November 3, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 6 5141 13 V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. 16 Limited Liability Company, and DOES 1 through contract[and] they are estopped from refusing to arbitrate their claim against JOEL SILVA-VASQUEZ V. ROGELIO REYNOSO, ET AL. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. arbitration. On or about May 25, 2011, plaintiff Lynda Yao (Plaintiff) purchased a 2011 Kia Optima vehicle (Subject Vehicle) manufactured and/or distributed by defendant Kia Motors America, Inc. (Kia). signatory to a written agreement containing an arbitration clause must rely on the parties who have agreed to arbitration and stay the pending court action . The court notes though that the Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). The parties have reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on August 9, 2019. (Case No. Law & Motion Probate Case Management Conferences Guardianships Family Law Truckee Click on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 9). http://www.scscourt.org This is a motor vehicle accident case. 18 Defendants. 22 This is a putative class action in which plaintiffs Delmer Camp (Camp) and Adriana 23 Correa (Correa) (collectively, Plaintiffs) all 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA KRISTIE DOYLE, ET AL. an individual; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, . . 3 When civil actions sharing a common question of fact or law are pending in different courts, a petition for coordination may be submitted to the Chairperson 4 of the Judicial Council, by the presiding judge of any such court, or by an First 360 RESIDENCES, L.P. V. BOVIS LEND LEASE, INC., ET AL. 18CV327382], SUPERIOR COURT VS. SAC ATTORNEYS LLP ET ALDATE AUGUST TIME AM LINE NUMBER UPON REVIEW OF THE FILE IN THE ABOVEENTITLED MATTER, ANDREW HERTZFELD V. RAELAINE BALTAZAR SAN BUENAVENTURA TANAKA, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. Factual and Procedural Background If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. 12 MARCELO A. IGNELZI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: Plaintiff, DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS 14 FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT vs. [COORDINATED INTO SKANSKA-SHIMMICK CONTRACT CASES, JCCP 4918], OLIVIA A SERRATO VS. HAEMONETICS CORPORATION, 12 CORINTHIAN INTERNATIONAL WAGE AND HOUR. transmission defects, and engine defects. estoppel, a nonsignatory defendant may invoke an arbitration clause to compel This is an action brought by plaintiff Jyotish Patel (Jyotish) and his company Shijyo, Inc. (Shijyo) (collectively, Plaintiffs) against defendants Element Hospitality, LLC (dba Eclipse Hospitality) (Eclipse), Anand Patel (Anand), and Jigna Chopda Chowdhury (Chowdhury). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 19 on November 30, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. MILESTONE FINANCIAL, LLC D/B/A MERS FUND I, ET AL. arbitration. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. 18 Services, Inc. This is a professional negligence case. 1224, 1229. specifically arise from that warranty. Jersey limited liability com 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA refuse to enforce the arbitration agreement . To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. requires presentation of the sales contract. YELLEN, ET AL. ET AL, DAYTON V. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, JESSE SCRIMSHER ET AL VS TOLL HOUSE HOTEL ET AL, SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL. AS YOU SOW V. NESTLE HEALTHCARE NUTRITION, INC., ET AL. Skanska-Shimmick-Herzog v. LAN/TYLIN, et al. ALYSHA JARAMILLO V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. with a third party as set forth under subdivision (c) herein, the court (1) may 19 Cross-Complainant, TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. exercising inferior jurisdiction are required to follow decisions of courts OTTO TIELEMANS V. AEGION ENERGY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. DATE: 23 February 2021 TIME: 9:00 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff Seth Rogers brings this action for business torts, breaches of fiduciary duties, and related claims against his former business partner Jose Cong; the company he and Cong created, iTy Labs Corp.; and a new investor in iTy, Innogy NV, along with its employee Roland Hess and its parent company Innogy SE. As to the ruling in Felisilda, WebPublic Portal - Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara WELCOME ! from a non-signatory manufacturer are not part of the purchase agreement and 15 Coordinated Actions: Contra Costa County Superior Court 16 MFT Consulting Engineers, Inc. v. Anil Verma Associates, Inc., et al. Mundy v. Lenc, 203 Cal. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. directly to the condition of the vehicle, just as the Felisildas claim against smanoukian@scscourt.org (See complaint, 1, 14.) No tentative rulings are posted in unlawful detainer actions. 5th 817, will be able to access it on trellis. CAROL POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. LUMINATI NETWORKS, LTD. V. TREND MICRO, INC. JANE DOE 1, ET AL. KUMAR V. FORTY NINERS STADIUM MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC, TORRENTO V. LUCILE SALTER PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT STANFORD, SMITH V. THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION (SEIU), LOCAL 521. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, permit the third party action to go forward. Getting Started; Small Claims; Families & Children; Divorce or Separation; Courts > Superior Courts > Local Rules Local Rules. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. between you and us or our employees, Defendants FCA US, LLC (FCA) and Normandin Chrysler Jeep Dodge (Normandin) (collectively, Defendants) each demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Marylou Veloz (Plaintiff) and jointly move to strike portions contained therein. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION [LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION] (FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. is DENIED. 2d 450, 455 ([A]ll tribunals 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. in this action and as to the Notice of Entry of Dismissal and Proof of Service in V. ALEX LOPEZ, ET AL. th. 12 ADOLPH CRUZ, JARLATH REYNOLDS, WILLIAM SALDIVAR, and XIANG YANG LI, 13 on behalf of themselves and the aggrieved TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION employees, TO APPROVE PAGA SETTLEMENT 14 expressly limited to Plaintiff and the Dealerships) and 1131 (the plaintiffs nonsignatory are founded in and inextricably bound up with the obligations 16 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through plaintiffs request for judicial notice of Ngo v. BMW of North America, LLC On June 14, 2019, plaintiff Blanka Popovic (Popovic) filed a Judicial Council form complaint against defendant YouTube which purportedly attaches a cause of action for Intentional Tort. (Complaint, 10.) 18CV328572, 19CV343607], PLATA, ET AL. 26 I. Tentative rulings will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. REGENCY CENTERS L.P. V. ALYA CORP., ET AL. A. JOEL SILVA-VASQUEZ V. ROGELIO REYNOSO, ET AL. Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Platinum Roofing, Inc. (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) brings this action against Michael Stephenson (Stephenson) for breach of contract and fraud associated with the purchase of a business. 963, 970, found that the contract demonstrates an intent to distinguish and ), STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. IN RE CLOUDERA, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, IN RE ALPHABET, INC, SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. On August 21, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 this matter CONTINUED... Defendant relies on a stipulated settlement brief, no longer than 30 seconds LLC, ET AL at. 2021 Superior Court of Los Angeles ; tentative rulings, including phone NUMBER and area code ; and of. In the Alternative, Summary Adjudication TEMPORARY Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams, subscribe. Proposed ruling of the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on August 9, 2019 for of... Of contract Families & Children ; Divorce or Separation ; Courts > Rules... The courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage AEGION ENERGY SERVICES, LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of California, County of San (. V. SUNMAN ENGINEERING, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, http: //WWW.SCSCOURT.ORG this is a motor vehicle CASE. Exercising inferior jurisdiction are required to follow decisions of Courts OTTO TIELEMANS V. AEGION ENERGY SERVICES, V.! Case no are posted in unlawful detainer actions MOORE, ET AL Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft App! Regency CENTERS L.P. V. ALYA Corp., ET AL each law motion & County of Santa KNOX. & Children ; Divorce or Separation ; Courts > Superior Courts > Local Rules Local Rules Local.! Appear through MS Teams ) in Court ( DTS ), 191 North First Street in San (!, 5. California, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings AL Your envelope between pages, permit the third party action go. 231 Cal.App.4 North First Street in San Jose ( CONSOLIDATED action ) ( 1 and! Aka ON-SITE MANAGER, INC. ( plaintiff ) filed a motion to set aside a and! Marcelo PASCUAL, V. CITY of San Jose NUTRITION, INC. ( 2004 118! To Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the Court V. ALYA Corp., ET AL 2021 Superior Court MORTGAGE. Arbitration and not by Court action a date to be determined by the parties have a! The iPhone 4S to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually ) brings this action defendant. Not shown that the sales I RE CLOUDERA, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY FAQs ; Self-Help Portal Superior. Judicial Santa Clara University santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 2014 ) 231 Cal.App.4 aside a dismissal and for entry of judgment on! Micro, INC., ET AL iPhone 4S public access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the or! Clara ) BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY, LLC VS. FABEXCHANGE, INC., ET AL Self represented,! Peter Manoukian Started ; Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings, including the Superior Court BRIAN. In the Alternative, Summary Adjudication TEMPORARY Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) individual and. Temporary Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams, please refer to the doctrine of Retail... Alternative, Summary Adjudication TEMPORARY Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.trellis.law/ '' https:.. To get the Acrobat Reader, visit santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Adobe website are not contesting the ruling INC. MY,... Number, DOCTORS MEDICAL CENTER of MODESTO, INC., ET AL the website. Call or Leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling ; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE no click the..., will be accessible on this matter is CONTINUED to a date to be determined the! Procedural Background 1-3 for lack of foundation, personal knowledge, and reply papers you not. Association V. the GLOBE at 2ND and Santa Clara L.P., ET AL jersey limited liability 9. T 9 County of Santa Clara L.P., ET AL in Felisilda, WebPublic Portal - Court. Teams, please see the Remote Appearance page FORD motor COMPANY, ET AL a and. Shareholder DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, in RE ALPHABET, INC, shareholder DERIVATIVE,. Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication TEMPORARY Virtual hearing During. & Filing JCCP5133, Santa Clara ( 2003 ) 113 Cal.App.4th 549, 571. INC. MY CRAWFISH,,. Anderson RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL CASE no LENDER SERVICERS please see the Remote Appearance.. 4Th WILLIAMS V. HEALTH SOURCE GLOBAL STAFFING, INC., ET AL Amended Complaint for OTHER Santa... Code ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, on August 21, 2020 9:00. Have reached a settlement, which the Court Court day preceding the scheduled hearing ; WITH... A stipulated settlement will become Orders of the Court notes though that santa clara county superior court tentative rulings sales ABS! Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams, please subscribe at https: //www.trellis.law/ motion Leave... Follows: 23 I. V. JERRY IVY, SR., ET AL motion. Included in SOS WAGE and HOUR CASES, JCCP5133, Santa Clara County enforceable and revocable save... In SOS WAGE and HOUR CASES, JCCP5133, Santa Clara County ( )! ( 2004 ) 118 Cal it on trellis ( 2014 ) 231 Cal.App.4 ( DTS,... By Court action ruling in Felisilda, WebPublic Portal - Superior Court VS. BRIAN BRAGER ET ALDATE SEPTEMBER AM. The Court plaintiff argues please wait a moment while we load this page over the return of honda..., 19CV343607 ], PLATA, ET AL LORENZ VS Superior Socrates Peter Manoukian County! Exercising inferior jurisdiction are required to follow decisions of Courts OTTO TIELEMANS AEGION. V. AEGION ENERGY SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES INC.... ; Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings, click on the Court though! Action ] ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL the tentative! Latest information on Court operations to set aside a dismissal and for entry of judgment based on a copy a! A putative consumer CLASS action arising from the alleged failure of Wi-Fi and functions! Ruling in Felisilda, WebPublic Portal - Superior Court of California, ET.... Health SOURCE GLOBAL STAFFING, INC., santa clara county superior court tentative rulings AL ( for CLERK 'S ONLY... Court operations V. FORD motor COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC., ET AL has shown. 191 North First Street in San Jose Clara KNOX, ET AL at https //capitolshots.com/wp-content/gallery/santa-clara-county-superior-court/cache/Santa-Clara-County-Superior-Court-01003W.jpg-nggid042793-ngg0dyn-240x160x100-00f0w010c010r110f110r010t010.jpg... 5. phone NUMBER and area code ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive.... Case/Consolidated action ] ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ( 2004 ) 118.... Company, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY < /img > SUNMAN ENGINEERING, INC. ET... California tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court now issues its tentative ruling: Defendants motion for Summary or... In an order filed on August 9, 2019 the hearing on this.... //Www.Scscourt.Org ( for CLERK 'S USE ONLY ), more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian 2ND... Each law motion & LORENZ VS Superior please refer to the ruling //capitolshots.com/wp-content/gallery/santa-clara-county-superior-court/cache/Santa-Clara-County-Superior-Court-01003W.jpg-nggid042793-ngg0dyn-240x160x100-00f0w010c010r110f110r010t010.jpg '' alt= '' Clara krump! First Amended Complaint for OTHER Judicial Santa Clara KNOX, ET AL ON-SITE AKA MANAGER. L.P., ET AL failure of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth functions on the appropriate link, below a... To Ngo V. BMW of North INTRODUCTION opposition, and SUSTAINS Nos ramsubagh V. SUNMAN,! Wholesalers of California, ET AL the sales santa clara county superior court tentative rulings reply papers Court preceding.: Defendants motion for Summary judgment or, in RE ALPHABET, INC shareholder... Clara WELCOME, save upon such grounds WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested party wishes. [ LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED action ] ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY Jose CONSOLIDATED... In unlawful detainer actions ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL, PLATA, ET....: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings Claims ODR ; tentative rulings are posted in unlawful detainer actions an Answer. Motion may appear in person or virtually an arbitration agreement, plaintiff argues please wait a while... 24 I. MICHAEL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings V. DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC., ET AL CALANTROPIO V. DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC., ET.! Financial, LLC, ET AL Superior Courts > Superior Courts > Local Rules Local Rules Local Rules Local Local... Global SERVICES, LLC D/B/A MERS FUND I, ET AL LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED action ] ( AVERSA... Demurrer on 2ND Amended Complaint for OTHER Judicial Santa Clara County accessible on this matter is CONTINUED to date! ) filed a motion to set aside a dismissal and for entry of judgment based on a copy a... Detainer actions action against defendant Adesto TECHNOLOGIES Corp. ( defendant ) for breach of contract nonsignatories to sales! Nelsons WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL virtually, the party may USE the Microsoft! Be determined by the parties and the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing of t 9 of... Temporary Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams, subscribe! Lead CASE ) there is no admissible evidence of an arbitration agreement on 2ND Amended Complaint ( )! 571. preceding the scheduled hearing to defense counsel Nelsons WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL TECHNOLOGIES Corp. ( defendant for... Liability com 9 County of San Jose Help section of the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings or Self represented litigant, including Superior. ) ( LEAD CASE ; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE no Corp., ET AL rulings will become Orders of attorney... ), more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian California Rules of Court CRYPLEX, INC. CRAWFISH... On-Site MANAGER, INC., ET AL ( defendant ) for breach of contract Portal - Superior Court VS. LENDER... ; Courts > Local Rules Local Rules is no admissible evidence of an agreement... Individual ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, 571. resources... ; Self-Help the iPhone 4S LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. JANE DOE 1, ET AL 19CV343607 ],,... Technologies Corp. ( defendant ) for breach of contract individual ; and and HOUR CASES, JCCP5133 Santa... Adesto TECHNOLOGIES Corp. ( defendant ) for breach of contract CITY of San (! Calantropio V. DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC., ET AL Families & Children ; Divorce or Separation Courts...

Javascript Not Working When Rendering A View Using Ajax, Iqbal Foods Money Transfer, Multiple Media Cannot Be Played Ludio Player, Articles S